待认领/0xwast3-222104

@0xWast3 · 三维场景 · Three.js

@0xWast3 用 Claude Opus 5.5 写成的Three.js / shader视频。

Author
@0xWast3
Made with
Claude Opus 5.5
Stack
Three.js · shader
Status
awaiting author
作者待认领

@0xWast3,你的优秀作品已经准备好成为 .motion 了,只差你的认领确认。认领后它会出现在你的名下,你可以决定是否发布为可复用的模板。

我是作者,去认领
PREVIEW · 4s@0xWast3Claude Opus 5.5

4 秒预览片段,作品归原作者 @0xWast3 所有。查看原帖 ↗

PROMPT作者公开的提示词

这条视频是怎么做出来的

Opus 5.5 turned one sentence into a 3D system that opens in Blender, rigged, textured and ready to animate.

It does not render the object. It constructs it, part by part, the way a modeller would if they had a week.

> PARSE - the sentence becomes a parts list with real dimensions, nothing implied
> MASS - each part built as clean geometry, quads only, no sculpted mush
> RIG - joints and pivots placed where the object physically bends
> SKIN - materials assigned per surface, scale and roughness set separately
> PACK - exported with a named hierarchy, so a human can edit one part

Image models stop at the render. What you get is a photograph of a thing that does not exist as a thing.

That gap appears the second someone wants to move an arm, swap a material, or send it to a printer.

Rigging is what nobody automates. Without pivots you have a statue, and a statue cannot be a system.

Topology beats detail every time. A dense mesh looks stunning in a screenshot and folds the moment it deforms.

Names carry through the whole export. Every part, joint and material reads the way a person would label it.

Studios burn days on modelling and cleanup before anyone gets to the creative part of the job.

The prompt format and what each stage returns are laid out underneath.

你也可以把这段提示词交给 Claude,做一条属于自己的版本。认领后,原作者可以把工程打包成可复用的 .motion 模板。